What Is Aaron L. Friedberg's Main Argument About The Future
In "Bucking Beijing: An Alternative U.S. China Policy," Aaron L. Friedberg argues that the United States should change its approach to China from one based on economic engagement to one focused on strategic competition. He believes that China's growing power and aggression in the region requires a more assertive stance from the U.S. Friedberg's article is based on his belief that for decades, the U.S. China policy has been driven by economic considerations but it should now shift to prioritize strategic advantage. Despite China's massive bilateral trade, the author asserts that the U.S. must not defer to China and instead motivate its neighbors to do the same.
In his 2012 article "Bucking Beijing: An Alternative U.S. China Policy," Aaron L. Friedberg argues that the United States should shift its approach to China from one based on economic engagement to one focused on strategic competition. He believes that China's growing power and aggression in the region requires a more assertive stance from the U.S. Friedberg's argument is rooted in the belief that the U.S. China policy has been predominantly driven by economic considerations for decades, but he contends that it should now prioritize strategic advantage. Despite China's significant bilateral trade, the author maintains that the U.S. must not defer to China and instead motivate its neighbors to adopt a similar stance.
Sources
Related Questions
Work fast from anywhere
Stay up to date and move work forward with BrutusAI on macOS/iOS/web & android. Download the app today.